<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further thoughts on fine tuning F1 qualifying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honda Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Honda Rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Sorry Richard, but I agree with RHM that the &quot;final session qualifying with race fuel&quot; sucks. Now there are 3 ways around this as I see it: 

1) Remove all fuel restrictions and let the guys go for it, in the process actually setting a better time than the second qualifying session;

2) Get the teams to specify how heavy their cars will be prior to the race start BEFORE qualifying, then let them qualify on low fuel; or

3) Have a Top Ten run off (similar to V8 Supercar) as the 3rd session. This is the solution to broadcasters&#039; (e.g. Bahrain GP) inability to focus on the right cars in final qualifying (note to all broadcasters - showing cars in the pits during qualifying while cars are on the track is NOT INTERESTING!!), and the one that I am most in favour of (to me, the 2nd best thing about Bathurst is the Top Ten on Saturday, either live or on TV)

Re RHM&#039;s blog about JV&#039;s comments about qualifying being &quot;so busy&quot;, but you&#039;re not able to set-up the car much. Well, isn&#039;t that what Fridays are about?? Oh that&#039;s right, the FIA&#039;s &quot;cost saving&quot; 2 race engine rule puts paid to that. I&#039;m sorry, but in a multi-billion dollar sport, having guys &quot;saving their engines&quot; while the manufacturers are throwing billions of dollars at it does not make sense. MORE ENGINE BLOW-UPS I SAY!! (JV&#039;s looked fantastic last week ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Richard, but I agree with RHM that the &#8220;final session qualifying with race fuel&#8221; sucks. Now there are 3 ways around this as I see it: </p>
<p>1) Remove all fuel restrictions and let the guys go for it, in the process actually setting a better time than the second qualifying session;</p>
<p>2) Get the teams to specify how heavy their cars will be prior to the race start BEFORE qualifying, then let them qualify on low fuel; or</p>
<p>3) Have a Top Ten run off (similar to V8 Supercar) as the 3rd session. This is the solution to broadcasters&#8217; (e.g. Bahrain GP) inability to focus on the right cars in final qualifying (note to all broadcasters &#8211; showing cars in the pits during qualifying while cars are on the track is NOT INTERESTING!!), and the one that I am most in favour of (to me, the 2nd best thing about Bathurst is the Top Ten on Saturday, either live or on TV)</p>
<p>Re RHM&#8217;s blog about JV&#8217;s comments about qualifying being &#8220;so busy&#8221;, but you&#8217;re not able to set-up the car much. Well, isn&#8217;t that what Fridays are about?? Oh that&#8217;s right, the FIA&#8217;s &#8220;cost saving&#8221; 2 race engine rule puts paid to that. I&#8217;m sorry, but in a multi-billion dollar sport, having guys &#8220;saving their engines&#8221; while the manufacturers are throwing billions of dollars at it does not make sense. MORE ENGINE BLOW-UPS I SAY!! (JV&#8217;s looked fantastic last week &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhm</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>rhm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingnerd.com/archives/109#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve blogged about the new qualifying procedure, why it sucks and how it came to be. Here firstly:
http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=65&amp;w=the_racing_blog
And more so here:
http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=66&amp;w=the_racing_blog

My opinion is that qualifying on race fuel was a bad idea to start with and keeping that rule for the top 10 cars this year is the worst idea ever in F1 (well, since Lola entered it anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve blogged about the new qualifying procedure, why it sucks and how it came to be. Here firstly:<br />
<a href="http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=65&#038;w=the_racing_blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=65&#038;w=the_racing_blog</a><br />
And more so here:<br />
<a href="http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=66&#038;w=the_racing_blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.exaflop.org/pivot/entry.php?id=66&#038;w=the_racing_blog</a></p>
<p>My opinion is that qualifying on race fuel was a bad idea to start with and keeping that rule for the top 10 cars this year is the worst idea ever in F1 (well, since Lola entered it anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

